Crowdlending Ranking

My personal ranking based on 12 months of real investment experience

Last update: October 1, 2026

📅 Rankings history

🏆 Top 3 Recommended

🥇

Lendermarket

8.0 / 10

Perf. since start: 16.47%

🥈

Nectaro

7.6 / 10

Perf. since start: 16.31%

🥉

Debitum

7.1 / 10

Perf. since start: 15.91%

📊 Portfolio Statistics

🏆 Full platform leaderboard

All platforms — sort by performance or note by clicking the column headers.

#PlatformPerf. since startMonth perf.Note ↓

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2016 | Regulatory framework: ECSPR
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 2.5/3
Maintenance 2.0/2
Age 1.0/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Auto-invest works well, can be truly passive

Global score 8.0/10 A · Excellent

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2023 | Regulatory framework: MiFID II
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 3.0/3
Maintenance 1.5/2
Age 0.6/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Interest paid on the 10th for business loans and weekly for personal loans, auto-invest recommended, low maintenance

Global score 7.6/10 B · Very good

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2019 | Regulatory framework: MiFID II
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 3.0/3
Maintenance 0.8/2
Age 0.8/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Auto-invest available. Interest paid at a fixed date at the end of each month, log in monthly to reinvest or withdraw

Global score 7.1/10 B · Very good

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2017 | Regulatory framework: ECSPR (PSFP)
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 2.5/3
Maintenance 0.8/2
Age 1.0/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Interest paid on the 6th of each month, log in monthly to reinvest or withdraw. Placement delays and non-reactive portfolio display

Global score 6.8/10 B · Very good

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2020 | Regulatory framework: ECSPR
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 2.5/3
Maintenance 0.8/2
Age 0.8/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

No auto-invest and few loans available, check monthly

Global score 6.6/10 B · Very good

Criteria breakdown

Created in May 2022 | Regulatory framework: MiFID II
Performance 1.0/4
Regulation 3.0/3
Maintenance 2.0/2
Age 0.6/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Long-term distressed-debt positions, set-and-forget

Global score 6.6/10 B · Very good

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2015 | Regulatory framework: MiFID
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 3.0/3
Maintenance 0.0/2
Age 1.0/1
Risk penalty −0.5
Monitoring

Weekly news follow-up on originators, monthly login to reinvest

Global score 6.0/10 B · Very good

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2023 | Regulatory framework: AML-only
Performance 3.5/4
Regulation 1.0/3
Maintenance 0.4/2
Age 0.6/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Monthly news follow-up, login every 2 months for interest and bonuses

Global score 5.5/10 C · Fair

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2025 | Regulatory framework: AML-only
Performance 4.0/4
Regulation 1.0/3
Maintenance 0.0/2
Age 0.4/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Weekly USDC interest withdrawal, manual project selection

Global score 5.4/10 C · Fair

Criteria breakdown

Created in May 2022 | Regulatory framework: Unregulated
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 0.3/3
Maintenance 1.3/2
Age 0.6/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Easy robot, short 90-day loans returning cash monthly

Global score 4.6/10 C · Fair

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2016 | Regulatory framework: AML-only
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 1.0/3
Maintenance 0.0/2
Age 1.0/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Weekly login to reinvest and reduce cash-drag

Global score 4.5/10 C · Fair

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2022 | Regulatory framework: Unregulated
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 0.3/3
Maintenance 1.0/2
Age 0.6/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Runs well, yearly login to reinvest short 30/90-day loans

Global score 4.4/10 C · Fair

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2026 | Regulatory framework: Unregulated
Performance 3.0/4
Regulation 0.3/3
Maintenance 0.5/2
Age 0.2/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Login every 6 months, manual selection, secondary market for exits

Global score 4.0/10 C · Fair

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2023 | Regulatory framework: Unregulated
Performance 2.5/4
Regulation 0.3/3
Maintenance 0.3/2
Age 0.6/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Young platform, low volume to keep an eye on

Global score 3.7/10 D · Risky

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2025 | Regulatory framework: Unregulated
Performance 3.5/4
Regulation 0.3/3
Maintenance 0.0/2
Age 0.4/1
Risk penalty −1.0
Monitoring

Weekly news follow-up, buyback / early-exit repayments to reinvest

Global score 3.2/10 D · Risky

Criteria breakdown

Created in 2025 | Regulatory framework: Unregulated
Performance 1.0/4
Regulation 0.3/3
Maintenance 0.3/2
Age 0.4/1
Risk penalty 0
Monitoring

Auto-invest works well, occasional temporary shortage of available loans

Global score 2.0/10 D · Risky

⚖️ Portfolio coherence

Each platform's target weight = its note / sum of notes. Gap = actual weight − target.

🟠 Overweight (6) 🔵 Underweight (4) 🟢 Balanced (6)

V1 · Actual vs target weight (note)

  • BienPrêter +3.79pts Overweight
  • MaClear +3.55pts Overweight
  • Nectaro +3.18pts Overweight
  • Afranga +2.30pts Overweight
  • 8Lends +1.90pts Overweight
  • Mintos🚫 +1.69pts Overweight
  • Triple Dragon +0.56pts Balanced
  • Lendermarket +0.14pts Balanced
  • Loanch +0.01pts Balanced
  • Revest -0.75pts Balanced
  • Hive5 -1.05pts Balanced
  • Debitum -1.47pts Balanced
  • Lonvest -1.81pts Underweight
  • FF Forest🚫 -3.31pts Underweight
  • Swaper -3.81pts Underweight
  • Indemo🚫 -4.58pts Underweight

V2 · Structure (excl. perf) x return

Size = actual weight. Hover for details.

0%10%20%30%40%BienPrêter · Actual11.70% · Gap +3.79pts · 11.41%BienPrêterMaClear · Actual9.95% · Gap +3.55pts · 31.53%MaClearNectaro · Actual12.02% · Gap +3.18pts · 16.31%NectaroAfranga · Actual9.97% · Gap +2.30pts · 12.88%Afranga8Lends · Actual8.18% · Gap +1.90pts · 41.32%8LendsMintos · Actual8.67% · Gap +1.69pts · 18.29%Triple Dragon · Actual5.21% · Gap +0.56pts · 23.50%Lendermarket · Actual9.44% · Gap +0.14pts · 16.47%Loanch · Actual5.13% · Gap +0.01pts · 15.37%Revest · Actual1.58% · Gap -0.75pts · 13.14%Hive5 · Actual4.30% · Gap -1.05pts · 13.70%Debitum · Actual6.79% · Gap -1.47pts · 15.91%Lonvest · Actual2.49% · Gap -1.81pts · 13.26%FF Forest · Actual0.41% · Gap -3.31pts · 21.70%FF ForestSwaper · Actual1.42% · Gap -3.81pts · 13.17%SwaperIndemo · Actual3.09% · Gap -4.58pts · 3.85%IndemoStructural score (regulation + maintenance + age − risk)Annualized return (%)

💶 Where to put fresh money?

Top 5 by note, excluding platforms to avoid this month, pro-rata to notes.

Not suggested this month

  • 🚫 Mintos — Avoid: platform under scrutiny
  • 🚫 FF Forest — Avoid: platform under scrutiny
  • 🚫 Indemo — Avoid: no interest paid this month
  • #1 Lendermarket 8.0/10 · 22.2% €1,110
  • #2 Nectaro 7.6/10 · 21.1% €1,050
  • #3 Debitum 7.1/10 · 19.7% €980
  • #4 BienPrêter 6.8/10 · 18.8% €940
  • #5 Afranga 6.6/10 · 18.3% €920

Visual guide, not investment advice: an underweight can be intentional (ongoing exit, cash-drag). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🔮 10-year projection

Compound interest simulation: an annualized rate is converted to a monthly rate (rate / 12) and reinvested every month for 120 months. By default, the average platform rate this month.

Indemo: 0.0% 8Lends: 35.3%
€22,000 (Total contributed) → €62,029
+€40,029 of interest over 10 years

Theoretical simulation at a constant rate. This is not investment advice: past performance does not guarantee future results and capital is at risk.

Monthly observations

✅ Positive points

Lendermarket tops the ranking (8.0/10): solid 16.47% annualized return, strong ECSPR regulation and efficient auto-invest.

Nectaro confirms second place (7.6/10) with 16.31% annualized and full MiFID II regulation, interests paid very regularly.

⚠️ Negative points

FF Forest stays at the bottom of the ranking (3.2/10): provisional red flags while the platform is under surveillance, heightened vigilance. Capital withdrawn, only reinvested interests keep running. The platform announces a transformation with a new regulated platform that would show a clean record to the German BaFin, still a hypothetical project not launched.

Indemo still at 0% in September, no interest paid, funds still locked.

👁️ To watch

8lends posts 35.28% for the month after swapping $8LNDS tokens for USDC on Uniswap: outside loan returns, not comparable to the base rate. Maclear stays solid at 15.12% and Triple Dragon stabilizes at 15.07%.

Revest dips to 2.32%: early-September deposit placed on 3-month bullet loans, interests due in about 30 days. Debitum at 10.64%: simple accounting shift, part of late-September interests paid on October 1st. Hive5 at 14.06%, nothing to report even if XIRR since the start looks a bit low.

🎯 Planned actions

I am waiting for the second part of the FF Forest funds to dispatch them to Loanch, Triple Dragon, Hive5 and Maclear. If I return to FF Forest, it will be on the new regulated platform if it launches. Meanwhile I reinvest interests on each platform and wait for the Revest bullets maturity.

💬 Other observations

I now use the XIRR() function available in Google Sheet: it computes the annualized return from the exact dates and amounts of each deposit and withdrawal, where my former average-investment calculation became too complex once withdrawals exceeded deposits.

⚠️ Avertissement : This ranking reflects my personal experience. It does not constitute investment advice. Observed returns include signup bonuses that temporarily inflate performance. Future months will show more realistic returns.

❓ Crowdlending ranking FAQ

What is the best crowdlending platform in 2026?

There is no single best platform: it depends on your goals. This ranking compares 15+ European P2P platforms on real returns observed month after month — check the Top 3 above for the current leaders.

How is this crowdlending ranking calculated?

I invest my own money on every platform listed here. The ranking combines annualized returns actually received (including signup bonuses), base interest rates, ease of use and project availability, and is updated every month.

Is crowdlending risky?

Yes. Lending money involves a risk of non-repayment and potential loss of capital: never invest money you may need short-term and spread your savings across several platforms. This site shares personal experience, not investment advice.

How much can you earn with crowdlending?

Annualized returns observed on this page range from around 10% to over 20% including bonuses, well above regulated savings — with a matching level of risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Explorer les plateformes →
👨‍💻

François - P2P investor since September 2025

Software engineer sharing personal investment experience

October 1, 2026

© 2026 p2p-in.com. All rights reserved.

This site does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks of capital loss.

p2p-in.com is an independent personal blog. It has no affiliation with Income Marketplace (getincome.com) or any other P2P platform.